Picture of attorney Thomas Mauriello
Justia Lawyer Rating for Mauriello Law Firm, APC

Consumer Class Action Litigation

The Firm has served as plaintiffs’ counsel, including interim class counsel, liaison counsel, and local counsel, in dozens of consumer class action litigations in state and federal courts alleging false advertising, unfair business practices, or defective or fraudulent products and services.

The Firm’s consumer class action cases have included, but have not been limited to, the following cases:

  • Wilcox v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (Loan modification fraud), U.S. District Court, Santa Ana, Case No. 8:10-CV-01923-DOC-JCG (consolidated in the U.S. District Court, Dist. Mass, 1:10-cv-10380-RGS)
  • Gass v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., (violation of Song-Beverley Credit Card Act for requesting and recording customers’ personal identification information), U.S. Dist. Ct. Central Dist. Of Cal.,Case No.: 2:11-CV-01507-SJO (JCGx)
  • In Re: Sony Gaming Networks and Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (breach of privacy regarding customer personal information), U.S. Dist. Ct. Southern Dist. Of Cal., Case No. 3:11-md-02258-AJB-MDD
  • Hoang et al. v. Ralph’s Grocery Company (underweighting and overcharging for prepared foods), Case No. 439213, Los Angeles Superior Court
  • Elaine Miller v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. (defective automobile braking system), Case No. BC431344, Los Angeles Superior Court
  • In Re Land Rover LR3 Tire Wear Litigation (defective automobile alignment geometry), U.S. Dist. Ct. Central Dist. Of Cal., Case No. 09-MDL-2008 AG
  • Tomkins v. Basic Research, LLC (false advertising of dietary supplement), U.S. Dist. Ct. Eastern Dist. Of Cal., Case No. 2:08-CV-00244-LKK-DAD; transferred to and pending in District of Utah, as Miller, et al. v. Basic Research, Case No. 2:07 cv 00871
  • Galvez v. TouchTel USA, LP (calling cards fraudulently sold and marketed to the Hispanic market), U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, CA, Case No. CV08-05642-RGK (JCx)
  • Montanez v. Gerber Childrenswear, LLC, et al. (“tagless” clothing labels), U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, CA, Case No. 2:09-cv-07420 DSF(DTBx)
  • Weeks v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, et al. (Enfamil baby formula), U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, CA, Case No. CV09-05835 DSF (CW)
  • Laudicina v. Toyota Motor Corporation (sudden vehicle acceleration), U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, CA, Case No. CV 10-01030
  • Hapner v. Sony Electronics, Inc. (soldering defect in Vaio laptop computers), San Diego County Superior Court, Case No. GIC 839244
  • Rosenfeld v. Gateway, Inc. (CX210X Convertible Notebook Computers), U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, CA, Case No. CV 08-03381 SVW (CTx)
  • iPod Nano Cases (first generation Nano), Los Angeles County Superior Court, JCCP No. 4469
  • In Re Hewlett Packard Power Connector Litigation (defective power plugs on HP Pavilion), U.S. District Court, San Jose, CA, Case No. C 06-1221-R
  • Sypher v. Soleus, Inc. (defective “Evaporative Technology” air conditioners), Los Angeles County Superior Court, Inc., Case No. BC 395530
  • Carper et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (PAX run flat tire system), U.S. Dist. Ct. Central Dist. Of Cal., Case No. 2:07-CV-01481-MMM-AJW

Among the published opinions the Firm has achieved as class counsel are Annunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2nd 1133 (C.D. Cal. 2005)(Selna, J.), in which the Court held that Proposition 64 does not impose a reliance requirement in consumer class actions filed under California Bus. & Prof. Code sec. 17200.

Client Reviews
Tom, thank you for your all help. Among the three other attorneys I talked with, I chose you because you really listened, asked thoughtful questions and sought all information to understand my situation. That gave me confidence in you above all others. I am a believer in receiving feedback, so I just wanted to share my thoughts with you. If I come across anyone that is looking for counsel in this industry I will certainly refer them your way. Scott Yi, Securities Registered Representative
Thomas was very thorough, kind and truly cared about me and my case. He went above and beyond the call of duty. Every time I contacted him he me made me feel like a very important client. His skills, intelligence and demeanor lead to a victory in the courtroom! Susan De Diminicantanio
As a business development consultant, there have been times to which I am in need of counsel for the review and strategic advice a range of diversified employment and compensation packages. In this sense, Thomas Mauriello has been my trusted counsel, paying particular attention to the settle nuances the language and structure of contractual agreements, and rely heavily on his expert opinion as a plaintiff's lawyer! Emma Makinen, DOAP Kitchens, LLC
Our Family needed an attorney who was knowledgeable with FINRA and Tom proved to be very familiar with FINRA. We found him, trustworthy, thorough, honest and sympathetic during an emotionally stressful time with our Family. Annette Hellmich
I would recommend Mr. Mauriello highly - - to anyone - - - wish I had more friends in the area who need an attorney! He was extremely knowledgeable, timely, courteous, - AND - he won my case! Would call him again in an instant should the need arise. Nancy Brown